In the future, participants (whether user, parent, or professional) in Athalye et al.'s study would like these decisions to be predominantly led by the users themselves. The study showed that current services are perceived to be predominantly led by CI centers where decisions related to appointments, provision of standard care, treatment, accessories, management, and long-term maintenance are made by the team at the CI center. The remaining respondents were parents (19%) and CI users (12%). Seven hundred forty-eight responses were obtained, the majority of which (69%) were from CI professionals. They used a questionnaire with close- and open-ended responses to explore the views of the current CI service delivery and the potential issues in the long term. Recently, Athalye, Archbold, Mulla, Lutman, and Nikolopoulous (2015) explored the perspectives of CI users, parents of pediatric CI users, and professionals in the United Kingdom. Currently, CIs are typically still only provided in specialized centers requiring a multidisciplinary team consisting of clinical audiologists ear, nose, and throat surgeons radiologists CI audiologists psychologists and speech and language therapists. As the number of implant users will grow, the current model of intensive clinic-centric CI programs will become unsustainable, with implant centers questioning their specialized methods of service delivery as an effective means of provision ( H. Currently, only 6% to 15% of potential adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates receive a CI ( De Raeve & van Hardeveld, 2014). The World Health Organization states that over 5% of the world's population-360 million people-has a disabling hearing loss and that approximately one third of people over 65 years of age are affected by disabling hearing loss ( World Health Organization, 2017).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |